ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

ARAS à valeurs d'ensemble floues intuitionnistes (Büyüközkan & Göçer 2018)×Processus d'analyse hiérarchique×ANP×Méthode Meilleur-Pire×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décisionPrise de décisionPrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19891980199620151995
Auteur d'origineAtanassov, K. T., Gargov, G.Saaty, T. L.Saaty, T. L.Rezaei, J.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeUtility-degree ranking MCDM under Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy uncertainty (IVIFN: ⟨[μ⁻,μ⁺],[ν⁻,ν⁺]⟩; μ⁺+ν⁺ ≤ 1) — additive sum of weighted-normalized IVIF performance ratings benchmarked against an optimal reference rowPairwise comparison (eigenvalue)Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LPStatistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatriceAtanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88888
RésuméIVIF-ARAS (Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy ARAS (Büyüközkan & Göçer 2018)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Atanassov, K. T., Gargov, G. in 1989. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: IVIF-ARAS · AHP · ANP · BWM · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-20 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare