Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Échelle de Contact Intergroupes× | Échelle des valeurs démocratiques× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Sociologie politique | Sociologie politique |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1954–2008 | 1999–2015 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Gordon Allport, Thomas Pettigrew, Linda Tropp | Russell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel |
| Type | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| Alias | ICS, Contact Quality Index | DVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The Intergroup Contact Scale measures the quantity and quality of face-to-face interaction between members of different social groups (racial, ethnic, religious, national, or other categories). Rooted in Gordon Allport's contact hypothesis (1954), which proposed that prejudice decreases when groups interact under favorable conditions, the scale is fundamental in research on prejudice reduction, integration, and intergroup relations. | The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|