Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Questionnaire sur les attitudes en médecine intégrative× | Échelle des attitudes envers la médecine complémentaire et alternative× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Médecine intégrative | Médecine intégrative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2005 | 2003 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Bikker, A. P.; Merelle, S. B.; Reinders, M. E. | Hough, H. J.; Darcey, V. L.; Scofield, R. F. |
| Type | Self-report scale | Self-report scale |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Bikker, A. P., Merelle, S. B., & Reinders, M. E. (2005). Attitudes towards integrative medicine among healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional survey. Patient Education and Counseling, 56(3), 327–335. link ↗ | Hough, H. J., Darcey, V. L., & Scofield, R. F. (2003). Attitudes toward alternative/complementary medicines among pharmacy students, faculty, and preceptors. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 67(3), 85. link ↗ |
| Alias | IMAQ | ACAMS |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | The IMAQ is a 26-item self-report instrument assessing healthcare professionals' attitudes toward integrative medicine—the combined use of conventional and complementary therapies based on evidence and patient-centered values. Developed by Bikker and colleagues, it measures five dimensions of attitudes: cognitive, practical, affective, and social aspects of integrative practice. | The ACAMS is a self-report instrument measuring healthcare professionals' and students' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine. Developed in the early 2000s, it assesses openness, acceptance, and perceived legitimacy of CAM alongside conventional medicine, helping identify educational gaps and organizational readiness for integrative practice. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|