Comparer des méthodes

	Comité d'éthique de la recherche	Principes d'intégrité de la recherche
Domaine	Éthique de la recherche	Éthique de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1974	2007
Auteur d'origine	U.S. Federal Requirement (National Research Act 1974); International adoption by WMA and research institutions globally	Multiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards)
Type	Standard	Framework
Source fondatrice	U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Office of the Federal Register.	National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press.
Alias	IRB, Research Ethics Committee, REC	Responsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards
Apparentées	4	4
Résumé	The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the independent ethics committee established at research institutions to review and approve human subjects research, ensuring compliance with ethical principles and federal regulations. Created as a legal requirement by the U.S. National Research Act (1974) and now adopted globally, the IRB serves as the primary mechanism for protecting research subjects while enabling legitimate research to proceed. No human subjects research can begin without IRB approval.	Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust.