Comparer des méthodes

	Codage in vivo	Phénoménologie
Domaine	Qualitatif	Qualitatif
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1967 (grounded theory origins); widely codified as a distinct method from the 1990s onward	Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927)
Auteur d'origine	Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss (grounded theory tradition); systematised and named by Johnny Saldaña	Edmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic)
Type	Qualitative research method	Qualitative research approach
Source fondatrice	Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1529731743	Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466
Alias	verbatim coding, literal coding, first-cycle in vivo coding, indigenous coding	Fenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	In vivo coding is a qualitative first-cycle coding strategy in which the researcher uses the participants' own words or short phrases verbatim as code labels, rather than imposing researcher-generated or theoretical language. The technique preserves the voice, meaning, and conceptual priorities of participants, making it especially valuable in grounded theory, phenomenology, and any study where honouring the emic (insider) perspective is central to analytic integrity.	Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context.