Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Facteur d'Impact des Revues× | Ulrichsweb Global Serials Directory× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Bibliométrie | Bibliométrie |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1955 | 1932 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Eugene Garfield, Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) | Bowker (originally R.R. Bowker), now ProQuest LLC |
| Type≠ | Metric | Database |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471-479. DOI ↗ | ProQuest. (2024). Ulrichsweb: Global Serials Directory. Retrieved from https://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com/ link ↗ |
| Alias≠ | IF, JIF, Impact Factor, 2-year Impact Factor | Ulrichsweb, Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory, Ulrich's Directory |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is a metric developed by Eugene Garfield in 1955 and published annually by Clarivate Analytics through Journal Citation Reports (JCR). It measures the average citation frequency of articles published in a journal over a two-year window, serving as a proxy for journal prestige and influence. A journal's Impact Factor equals the number of citations received in year Y to articles published in Y-1 and Y-2, divided by the number of citable items published in that same window. Despite widespread adoption in research evaluation, Impact Factor has significant limitations and critics argue it conflates journal prestige with article quality. | Ulrichsweb is a comprehensive, subscription-based global serials directory cataloging over 300,000 print and electronic journals, magazines, newspapers, and other periodical publications. Developed by ProQuest (originally R.R. Bowker), Ulrichsweb has served librarians and researchers for over 90 years as the authoritative source for journal metadata, publication information, and peer-review verification. A unique feature is Ulrichsweb's verification program: editorial staff contact journals directly to confirm peer-review claims, marking journals as 'refereed' only after validation. This verification process distinguishes legitimate peer-reviewed journals from predatory publishers falsely claiming peer review. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|