Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Ideological Constraint Analysis× | Political Sophistication Measurement× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Psychologie politique | Psychologie politique |
| Famille≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1964 | 1987 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Philip E. Converse | Robert C. Luskin & John Zaller |
| Type≠ | Belief-system structure analysis | Composite cognitive index |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press. ISBN: 9780029006702 | Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521407861 |
| Alias | Belief System Constraint, Attitude Constraint Analysis, Issue Consistency Analysis | Political Awareness Index, Political Expertise Measure, Cognitive Sophistication Index |
| Apparentées | 4 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Ideological constraint analysis measures the degree to which an individual's or a public's political attitudes hang together in a coherent, predictable structure, the extent to which knowing a person's position on one issue lets you predict their positions on others. Introduced by Converse (1964) as the defining feature of a belief system, it is assessed through inter-item correlations, factor/latent-dimension models, and constraint indices. | Political sophistication measurement assesses the size, range, and organization of an individual's political belief system, the degree to which a person's political cognitions are numerous, wide-ranging, and well integrated. Luskin (1987) developed rigorous operationalizations, and Zaller (1992) showed that political awareness, his preferred sophistication indicator, governs how citizens receive and accept political messages. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|