ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

HF-TOPSIS×Pondération des critères par corrélation inter-critères×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20131995
Auteur d'origineXu, Z., Zhang, X.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
TypeDistance-to-ideal ranking (Hwang-Yoon 1981) extended to Hesitant Fuzzy Elements (HFE ⊂ [0,1]) via the hesitant normalised Euclidean distance d_1 (Xu-Xia 2011b); supports three weight-information modes: fully specified, completely unknown (Eq.(22) maximizing deviation closed-form), and partly known (Model M-2 linear programme).Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
Source fondatriceXu, Z., Zhang, X. (2013). Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information. Knowledge-Based Systems DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméHF-TOPSIS (Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS with optional incomplete weight information (Xu-Zhang 2013 KBS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Xu, Z., Zhang, X. in 2013. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: HF-TOPSIS · CRITIC. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare