Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Grey-TODIM× | Processus d'analyse hiérarchique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1992 | 1980 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Gomes, L. F. A. M., Lima, M. M. P. P. | Saaty, T. L. |
| Type≠ | Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄]) | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | (). UNCONFIRMED — GREY-TODIM specific seminal not confirmed via systematic literature search. PENDING link ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | GREY-TODIM (Grey-TODIM — Grey extension of TODIM) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gomes, L. F. A. M., Lima, M. M. P. P. in 1992. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|