ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Pondération par le coefficient de Gini×Évaluation du rapport additif×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19122010
Auteur d'origineGini, C.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
TypeWeight_Objective (Gini inequality coefficient applied to normalised criterion column)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
Source fondatriceGini, C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità. Studi economico-giuridici della R. Università di Cagliari link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméGINI-WEIGHT (Gini Coefficient Weighting — inequality-of-discrimination objective weighting) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Gini, C. in 1912. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: GINI-WEIGHT · ARAS. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare