ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse de Compromis Flexible et Universelle×CILOS×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20002016
Auteur d'origineRaveh, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V.
TypeWeighted rank aggregation (Borda-type with rank-based weights)Relative criterion-loss matrix weighting (Mirkin theorem based)
Source fondatriceRaveh, A. (2000). Co-plot: A graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméFUCA (Flexible and Universal Compromise Analysis) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Raveh, A. in 2000. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CILOS (Criterion Impact LOSs objective weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Podvezko, V. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: FUCA · CILOS. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare