Comparer des méthodes

	Analyse scientométrique de cartographie de domaine	Analyse bibliométrique
Domaine	Scientométrie	Scientométrie
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2000s (mature form); roots in 1960s-1970s scientometrics	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
Auteur d'origine	Kevin Boyack, Richard Klavans, Katy Borner (field-level science mapping); broader tradition rooted in Derek de Solla Price and Henry Small	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
Type	Quantitative bibliometric analysis	Quantitative literature analysis
Source fondatrice	Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Alias	science field mapping, research field delineation, scientometric field analysis, knowledge domain mapping	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Field-mapping scientometric analysis uses quantitative bibliometric techniques — co-citation, bibliographic coupling, co-authorship, and keyword co-occurrence — to delineate the intellectual structure and boundaries of a scientific field. By transforming large publication datasets into similarity networks and clustering them into research fronts and knowledge bases, it produces visual maps that reveal how subfields relate, where boundaries lie, and how the field evolves over time.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.