ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse Phénoménologique Interprétative Basée sur le Terrain×Enquête narrative basée sur le terrain×
DomaineQualitatifQualitatif
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1999–2009 (IPA seminal; field-based adaptation emerging 2000s–2010s)1990s–2000s
Auteur d'origineSmith, Flowers & Larkin (IPA); field extension drawn from ethnographic fieldwork traditionsD. Jean Clandinin & F. Michael Connelly
TypeQualitative research approachQualitative research design
Source fondatriceSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787943943
AliasField IPA, Fieldwork IPA, Field-based IPA, Field-grounded interpretive phenomenologyfield narrative inquiry, naturalistic narrative inquiry, field-situated narrative research, in-situ narrative inquiry
Apparentées56
RésuméField-based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Field IPA) extends standard IPA by embedding data collection within naturalistic field settings. Rather than relying solely on retrospective interviews conducted away from the site of experience, the researcher enters the actual environment — a classroom, clinic, workplace, or community space — to gather field observations, artefacts, and in-context conversations alongside in-depth interviews. This produces a richer, more situated account of how participants make sense of their lived experience in the moment and place in which it unfolds.Field-based narrative inquiry is a qualitative research design that investigates human experience by collecting and interpreting stories directly within the natural settings where those experiences unfold. Rooted in Clandinin and Connelly's narrative inquiry framework, it moves the researcher into participants' lived worlds — classrooms, workplaces, communities — to gather rich field texts that preserve the contextual, temporal, and relational dimensions of experience through story.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Field-based Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis · Field-based narrative inquiry. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare