Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Analyse de contenu basée sur le terrain× | Analyse documentaire× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine≠ | Qualitatif | Recherche qualitative |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1987 | 1920 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | David L. Altheide | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| Type≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77. DOI ↗ | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| Alias | field content analysis, naturalistic content analysis, ethnographic content analysis, ECA | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| Apparentées≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Résumé≠ | Field-based content analysis is a qualitative analytic approach that systematically examines documents, artifacts, and texts encountered or produced within a natural field setting. Originally formulated by David Altheide as ethnographic content analysis (ECA), it blends the systematic rigor of traditional content analysis with the reflexive, iterative logic of ethnographic inquiry, allowing the researcher to interact continuously with the data and revise analytic categories as new meaning emerges from the field. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|