Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Théorie Ancrée Classique Basée sur le Terrain× | Théorie ancrée constructiviste× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Qualitatif | Qualitatif |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1967 (Glaser & Strauss); field-based application codified from late 1970s onward | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Barney G. Glaser (classic GT); field-based variant draws on naturalistic inquiry traditions | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative theory-generating design | Qualitative research method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press. link ↗ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| Alias | Glaserian grounded theory in naturalistic settings, classic GT field study, field-based GT, naturalistic classic grounded theory | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| Apparentées | 6 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Field-based classic grounded theory applies Barney Glaser's original (Glaserian) grounded theory method within naturalistic, in-situ settings — combining sustained field immersion with the classic GT emphasis on emergence, theoretical sensitivity, and the constant comparative method. The researcher enters the social scene without a predetermined framework, collects data through observation and naturalistic interviews, and allows a substantive theory to surface inductively from the field rather than imposing conceptual structure in advance. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|