Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Méthode de pondération des relations de facteurs× | Évaluation du rapport additif× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2020 | 2010 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Type≠ | Weight_Subjective (pairwise factor relationship matrix, closed-form weights) | Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. (2020). Novel integrated multi-criteria ranking methodology: Case of public administration efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research link ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗ |
| Alias | — | — |
| Apparentées | 8 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | FARE (Factor Relationship weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|