Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Technique Delphi en face à face× | Technique Delphi en ligne× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Méthodologie d'enquête | Méthodologie d'enquête |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1950s–1963 | Original Delphi: 1950s–1960s; Online variant: mid-1990s onwards |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation) | Olaf Helmer, Norman Dalkey, Nicholas Rescher (RAND Corporation); online adaptation emerged in the 1990s–2000s |
| Type≠ | Structured expert-consensus method | Iterative expert consensus method (online) |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. DOI ↗ | Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. DOI ↗ |
| Alias | in-person Delphi, face-to-face Delphi, conventional Delphi, FtF Delphi | e-Delphi, electronic Delphi, web-based Delphi, internet Delphi |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | The face-to-face Delphi Technique is a structured, iterative consensus-building method conducted through in-person sessions with a purposively selected panel of experts. Across multiple rounds, panelists independently respond to structured questionnaires, receive aggregated group feedback, and revise their judgments until acceptable consensus is reached. The face-to-face format adds direct interpersonal interaction while preserving the anonymity of individual ratings within each round. | The Online Delphi Technique (e-Delphi) is an iterative, web-mediated consensus method in which a geographically dispersed panel of experts responds to successive rounds of structured questionnaires distributed and collected via email or a web platform. Anonymous feedback and controlled statistical summaries are fed back between rounds, guiding panellists toward convergence on priorities, predictions, or recommendations without the social pressures of face-to-face group discussion. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|