Comparer des méthodes

	Ensemble de vote explicable	SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations)
Domaine	Apprentissage automatique	Apprentissage automatique
Famille	Machine learning	Machine learning
Année d'origine	2016–2020	2017
Auteur d'origine	Composite: voting ensemble (Dietterich, 2000) + XAI frameworks (Ribeiro et al., 2016; Lundberg & Lee, 2017)	Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I.
Type	Ensemble with post-hoc or ante-hoc interpretability	Model-explanation method (Shapley-value attribution)
Source fondatrice	Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.	Lundberg, S.M. & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4766–4777.
Alias	XAI voting ensemble, interpretable voting classifier, transparent voting ensemble, explainable majority vote model	SHAP Değerleri (Model Açıklanabilirlik), Shapley additive explanations, SHAP values, model explainability
Apparentées	6	5
Résumé	An Explainable Voting Ensemble combines predictions from multiple diverse base models through majority vote (hard voting) or averaged probabilities (soft voting), then applies post-hoc or ante-hoc XAI techniques — such as SHAP values, LIME, or permutation importance — to produce feature-level explanations for the combined model's decisions. The goal is to retain the accuracy gains of ensemble aggregation while meeting interpretability requirements in high-stakes or regulated applications.	SHAP is a model-explanation method, introduced by Scott Lundberg and Su-In Lee in 2017, that uses Shapley values from cooperative game theory to measure how much each feature contributes to an individual prediction, making the output of black-box machine-learning models interpretable. It supports both global explanations (overall feature importance) and local explanations (why one specific prediction came out the way it did).