ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Ethnographie×Vérification par les membres et validation par les répondants×Observation participante×
DomaineQualitatifRecherche qualitativeRecherche qualitative
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'originec. 1922 (Malinowski's Argonauts of the Western Pacific)19851922
Auteur d'origineBronisław Malinowski (modern ethnography); rooted in 19th-century anthropologyYvonna Lincoln and Egon GubaBronislaw Malinowski
TypeQualitative fieldwork traditionMethodMethod
Source fondatriceHammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (4th ed.). Routledge. ISBN: 978-1138504462Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432
AliasEtnografi, participant observation, fieldwork, ethnographic researchmember validation, respondent validation, participant feedback, credibility checkethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation
Apparentées544
RésuméEthnography is a qualitative research tradition in which a researcher immerses themselves in a social group or community over an extended period — typically three to six months or longer — to study its culture, values, and behaviours in their natural setting. Originating in social and cultural anthropology, and consolidated as a rigorous method by Bronisław Malinowski in the early twentieth century, ethnography produces rich, contextualised accounts of how people live, work, and make meaning together.Member checking is a quality assurance procedure in qualitative research in which the researcher shares preliminary findings, interpretations, or analytical themes with research participants and asks whether the findings accurately reflect their perspectives and experiences. Developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as a trustworthiness criterion, member checking is considered a key method for ensuring credibility and reducing researcher misinterpretation. The goal is to verify that the researcher has understood participants correctly and that interpretations are grounded in participants' actual meaning-making, not the researcher's assumptions. Member checking can occur at different points in research (after individual interviews, after initial analysis, or after draft findings are written) and take different forms (individual feedback, group validation, interactive discussion).Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Ethnography · Member Checking and Respondent Validation · Participant Observation. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare