Comparer des méthodes

	Conception pragmatique mixte à poids égaux	Schéma de méthodes mixtes à priorité quantitative
Domaine	Conception de la recherche	Conception de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2000s–2010s	2003–2009
Auteur d'origine	Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars)	Creswell & Plano Clark; Teddlie & Tashakkori
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Source fondatrice	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Alias	equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic design	QUAN-dominant mixed methods, quantitative-dominant mixed methods, quan-priority design, quantitative-first mixed methods
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions.	Quantitative-priority mixed methods design is a research approach in which quantitative data and analysis carry the primary explanatory weight, while qualitative data play a supplementary or corroborating role. The researcher collects and analyzes quantitative data first (or concurrently with greater emphasis), then uses qualitative findings to elaborate, explain, or contextualize the statistical results. Priority and sequence together define where integration occurs and how each strand informs the other.