Comparer des méthodes

	Conception pragmatique mixte à poids égaux	Schéma de méthodes mixtes à priorité qualitative
Domaine	Conception de la recherche	Conception de la recherche
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	2000s–2010s	1991–2003 (formalized in mixed methods typologies)
Auteur d'origine	Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars)	Janice Morse; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
Type	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
Source fondatrice	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Alias	equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic design	QUAL-dominant mixed methods, qualitative-dominant mixed design, qual-priority MMR, qualitative-weighted mixed methods
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions.	Qualitative-priority mixed methods design is a mixed methods approach in which qualitative inquiry carries the greater weight — in terms of volume, analytical depth, and interpretive authority — while a supplementary quantitative strand provides supporting evidence. The design acknowledges that the phenomenon under study is best understood through meaning-making, lived experience, or social processes, with numbers used to corroborate or contextualize, not to dominate, the research story.