ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Enduring Rivalry Analysis×Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis×
DomaineInternational RelationsInternational Relations
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine20001996
Auteur d'originePaul Diehl & Gary Goertz (and the rivalry research program)Daniel Jones, Stuart Bremer & J. David Singer (Correlates of War project)
TypeDyadic analysis treating recurring conflict as the unitCoding and statistical analysis of interstate militarized confrontations
Source fondatriceDiehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (2000). War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. link ↗Jones, D. M., Bremer, S. A., & Singer, J. D. (1996). Militarized interstate disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, coding rules, and empirical patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 15(2), 163–213. DOI ↗
AliasInterstate Rivalry Analysis, Rivalry Approach to Conflict, Strategic Rivalry Analysis, Enduring RivalriesMID Analysis, Militarized Dispute Coding, Correlates of War Dispute Analysis, Dyadic Conflict Onset Analysis
Apparentées33
RésuméEnduring rivalry analysis studies the long-running, recurring antagonisms between particular pairs of states — India and Pakistan, the United States and the Soviet Union, Israel and its neighbors — as a distinct unit of analysis. Pioneered by Diehl and Goertz in War and Peace in International Rivalry (2000), it identifies rivalries from patterns of repeated militarized disputes, classifies their intensity, and analyzes their origins, dynamics, and termination. The approach argues that conflict is concentrated in a small number of rivalries and that understanding these histories explains much of interstate war.Militarized interstate dispute (MID) analysis is the coding and quantitative study of confrontations in which one state threatens, displays, or uses military force against another. Built on the Correlates of War project's MID dataset and the coding rules codified by Jones, Bremer, and Singer (1996), it provides the standard observational measure of interstate conflict short of and including war, structured as dyad-years so that the onset, escalation, and outcomes of disputes can be modeled statistically across two centuries of the international system.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Enduring Rivalry Analysis · Militarized Interstate Dispute Analysis. Consulté le 2026-06-25 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare