Comparer des méthodes

	Appariement dynamique par score de propension	Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)
Domaine	Inférence causale	Inférence causale
Famille	Regression model	Regression model
Année d'origine	1986-2010	1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origine	Robins (1986) on sequential treatments; Lechner & Miquel (2010) on dynamic matching	Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
Type	Sequential causal matching	Causal inference / reweighting
Source fondatrice	Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137.	Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55.
Alias	dynamic PSM, sequential propensity score matching, longitudinal propensity matching, DPSM	PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées	6	6
Résumé	Dynamic Propensity Score Matching (DPSM) extends classic propensity score matching to settings where treatment is assigned repeatedly over time and earlier treatment choices influence later ones. It estimates the causal effect of entire treatment sequences or regime changes by constructing matched comparisons at each decision point using the full history of covariates and prior treatments.	Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).