ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation d'impact contrefactuelle dynamique×Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine1986–20091983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origineRobins (1986); Lechner (2009) for sequential treatment settingsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeCausal inference / program evaluationCausal inference / reweighting
Source fondatriceRobins, J. M. (1986). A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period — application to control of the healthy worker survivor effect. Mathematical Modelling, 7(9-12), 1393-1512. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Aliasdynamic CIE, dynamic treatment evaluation, time-varying counterfactual analysis, longitudinal counterfactual evaluationPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées66
RésuméDynamic Counterfactual Impact Evaluation (dynamic CIE) extends standard counterfactual program evaluation to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially across multiple periods. Rather than comparing a single treated versus untreated state, it estimates the causal effect of entire treatment trajectories or regimes, accounting for how intermediate outcomes and time-varying covariates feed back into subsequent treatment decisions.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Dynamic Counterfactual Impact Evaluation · Propensity Score Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare