ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Estimation doublement robuste en recherche en éducation×Pondération par score de propension (PSP / IPW)×
DomaineInférence causaleInférence causale
FamilleRegression modelRegression model
Année d'origine1994-20051983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Auteur d'origineRobins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994); Bang & Robins (2005)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
TypeCausal inference / semiparametric estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Source fondatriceBang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly Robust Estimation in Missing Data and Causal Inference Models. Biometrics, 61(4), 962-973. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
AliasDR estimator in education, AIPW in education, augmented IPW in education research, doubly robust causal estimation for educational outcomesPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Apparentées66
RésuméDoubly robust estimation (DR) is a semiparametric causal inference approach that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity score model. In education research, it is used to estimate the causal effect of educational programs, interventions, or policies on student outcomes when treatment assignment is non-random but observed covariates can account for selection bias. The estimator is consistent if either — not necessarily both — of the two component models is correctly specified.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Doubly Robust Estimation in Education Research · Propensity Score Weighting. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare