Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Estimation doublement robuste (AIPW)× | Pondération par l'inverse de la probabilité de traitement (IPW / IPTW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Inférence causale | Inférence causale |
| Famille | Regression model | Regression model |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2005 | 2000 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins | Robins, Hernán & Brumback |
| Type≠ | Semiparametric causal estimator | Causal inference weighting estimator |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11(5), 550-560. DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW) | IPW, IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting, marginal structural model weighting |
| Apparentées | 5 | 5 |
| Résumé≠ | Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified. | Inverse Probability Weighting is a causal-inference method that assigns each observation a weight equal to the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received. Introduced by Robins, Hernán and Brumback (2000) for marginal structural models, it builds a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of measured confounders, balancing selection bias. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|