Comparer des méthodes

	Conception expérimentale à sujet unique et en double aveugle	Conception à lignes de base multiples
Domaine	Plans d'expériences	Plans d'expériences
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1970s–1980s (systematic integration of blinding into SCED)	1968
Auteur d'origine	Barlow, Hersen, and colleagues (single-subject tradition); double-blind masking adapted from clinical trial methodology	Donald M. Baer, Montrose M. Wolf, Todd R. Risley
Type	Experimental single-subject design with double-blind masking	Single-subject experimental design
Source fondatrice	Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195341881	Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97.
Alias	double-blind SCED, double-blind single-case experimental design, masked single-subject design, double-blind N-of-1 design	MBD, multiple-baseline single-case design, staggered baseline design, multiple-probe design
Apparentées	5	4
Résumé	A double-blind single-subject experimental design applies systematic masking — concealing treatment assignment from both the participant and the outcome assessor — within a within-person repeated-measures framework. It is used when researchers need strong causal inference about an intervention's effect on a single individual while guarding against placebo responses and observer bias. Particularly prominent in pharmacological, behavioral, and clinical rehabilitation research.	The multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design that demonstrates functional control by introducing an intervention at staggered time points across two or more baselines — typically across different behaviors, individuals, or settings. Because no withdrawal of treatment is required, it is especially suitable when the target behavior is irreversible or when removing an effective intervention would be unethical.