ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Plan à bases multiples en double aveugle×Plan expérimental à sujet unique×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1968 (multiple baseline); double-blind extension applied from 1980s onward in clinical behavioral research1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
Auteur d'origineMultiple baseline: Baer, Wolf & Risley (1968); double-blind procedural extension adapted from clinical trial methodologyMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
TypeSingle-subject experimental design with blinded outcome assessmentExperimental research design
Source fondatriceBaer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1(1), 91–97. DOI ↗Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
AliasDB-MBD, blinded multiple baseline design, masked multiple baseline design, double-blind MBDSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
Apparentées56
RésuméThe double-blind multiple baseline design is a single-subject experimental design in which an intervention is introduced sequentially across two or more independent baselines — behaviors, individuals, or settings — while outcome assessors (and ideally participants) remain unaware of which baseline is currently in the intervention phase. The double-blind procedural overlay reduces measurement bias and demand characteristics, strengthening causal inference beyond what a standard multiple baseline design offers.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Double-blind Multiple Baseline Design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare