ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Conception expérimentale à double insu avec groupe témoin×Conception expérimentale avec groupe témoin×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1930s–1950s (formalized in clinical trial methodology)1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
Auteur d'origineR. A. Fisher (experimental control foundations); blinding practices evolved in clinical research through the 20th centuryRonald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
TypeExperimental research designExperimental research design
Source fondatriceFisher, R. A. (1935). The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd. link ↗Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
Aliasdouble-blind controlled experiment, DB-CG design, double-masked controlled trial, double-blind controlled studycontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Apparentées54
RésuméA double-blind control group experimental design is a rigorous experimental structure in which participants are randomly assigned to at least one treatment group and one control group, while both the participants and the researchers collecting or assessing outcomes are kept unaware of group assignment. By combining allocation concealment with blinding at two levels, the design minimizes expectancy bias, placebo effects, and assessor bias simultaneously, making it a cornerstone of high-quality intervention research in medicine, psychology, and the social sciences.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Double-blind Control Group Experimental Design · Control Group Experimental Design. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare