ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Conception AB en double aveugle×Plan expérimental à sujet unique×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1960s (AB design); double-blinding integration in single-case clinical research from the 1980s–1990s1960s (Sidman 1960; formal applied codification by Kazdin and Baer in 1970s–1980s)
Auteur d'origineDerived from the AB single-subject design tradition (Sidman 1960; Baer, Wolf, & Risley 1968) combined with double-blinding conventions from clinical trial methodologyMurray Sidman (foundational tactics); B. F. Skinner (applied behavior analysis lineage)
TypeSingle-subject experimental design with double-blindingExperimental research design
Source fondatriceKazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195030440
Aliasblinded AB design, double-blind single-case AB, masked AB design, double-blind baseline-intervention designSSED, single-case experimental design, n-of-1 design, intrasubject replication design
Apparentées56
RésuméThe double-blind AB design is a single-subject experimental approach that sequences a baseline phase (A) and an intervention phase (B) while concealing phase allocation from both the participant and the outcome assessor. It merges the idiographic focus of single-case methodology with the bias-control mechanism of double-blinding, making it especially useful in clinical rehabilitation, pain research, and behavioral medicine when objective measurement of an individual's response to treatment is the primary goal.Single-subject experimental design (SSED) establishes experimental control by repeatedly measuring one individual (or a small number of individuals) across baseline and intervention phases, using the participant as their own control. Instead of comparing groups, it compares the participant's own behavior across conditions over time. Widely used in applied behavior analysis, special education, rehabilitation, and clinical psychology, SSED allows causal inference from small or unique samples where group designs are impractical.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Double-blind AB design · Single-Subject Experimental Design. Consulté le 2026-06-19 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare