ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Normalisation Double Basée sur l'Agrégation Multiple×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20202025
Auteur d'origineLiao, H., Wu, X.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
TypeDual-normalisation aggregation (linear + vector)Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
Source fondatriceLiao, H., Wu, X. (2020). DNMA: A double normalization-based multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Omega DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméDNMA (Double Normalization-Based Multiple Aggregation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Liao, H., Wu, X. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: DNMA · CIMAS. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare