ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Validité discriminante×Validité convergente×
DomainePsychométriePsychométrie
FamilleLatent structureLatent structure
Année d'origine19591959
Auteur d'origineDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
TypeValidity evidence / psychometric evaluationValidity evidence / construct validation
Source fondatriceCampbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
Aliasdiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
Apparentées54
RésuméDiscriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Discriminant Validity · Convergent Validity. Consulté le 2026-06-17 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare