Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Critique textuelle numérique× | Analyse herméneutique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Méthodes de terrain | Méthodes de terrain |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1990s–2000s (mature field by early 2000s) | 19th–20th century (Schleiermacher ~1819; Dilthey ~1883; Gadamer 1960; Ricoeur 1969) |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Patrick Sahle, Peter Robinson, and the digital humanities community (building on traditional textual criticism) | Friedrich Schleiermacher; Wilhelm Dilthey; Hans-Georg Gadamer; Paul Ricoeur |
| Type≠ | Qualitative-computational philological method | Qualitative interpretive method |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Sahle, P. (2013). Digitale Editionsformen. Zum Umgang mit der Überlieferung unter den Bedingungen des Medienwandels. 3 vols. Norderstedt: Books on Demand. link ↗ | Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method (G. Barden & J. Cumming, Trans.). Seabury Press. (Original work published 1960 as Wahrheit und Methode). ISBN: 978-0826400185 |
| Alias | digital philology, computational textual criticism, digital scholarly editing, digital critical editing | hermeneutics, hermeneutical interpretation, interpretive hermeneutics, philosophical hermeneutics |
| Apparentées≠ | 4 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | Digital textual criticism is the application of computational and digital methods to the scholarly analysis, collation, and editing of historical texts. Building on centuries-old philological practice, it uses tools such as XML/TEI encoding, automated collation software (e.g., CollateX), and computational stemmatology to compare manuscript witnesses, reconstruct textual transmission histories, and produce digital critical editions that are richer and more transparent than their print counterparts. | Hermeneutic analysis is a qualitative interpretive method for uncovering the meaning of texts, documents, spoken discourse, or human actions. Rooted in 19th-century biblical and legal scholarship and systematised by Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Gadamer, and Ricoeur, it operates through the hermeneutic circle: the meaning of a part is understood through the whole, and the meaning of the whole is revised as parts are interpreted. The goal is not to measure or code, but to achieve a deepening, dialogic understanding of the object of interpretation. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|