ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Théorie Ancrée Straussienne Numérique×Théorie ancrée constructiviste×
DomaineQualitatifQualitatif
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1990 (Strauss & Corbin foundational); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967)
Auteur d'origineAnselm Strauss & Juliet Corbin (foundational GT); adapted to digital contexts by subsequent methodologistsKathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967)
TypeQualitative research design and analysis approachQualitative research method
Source fondatriceStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803959408Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539
Aliasdigital GT (Straussian), Straussian GT in digital contexts, online Straussian grounded theory, digital Strauss-Corbin grounded theoryCGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory
Apparentées66
RésuméDigital Straussian grounded theory applies the systematic, coding-driven approach of Strauss and Corbin's grounded theory to digital data sources such as online forums, social media, chat logs, and digital documents. It retains the Straussian paradigm model and three-stage coding structure — open, axial, and selective — while adapting sampling strategies, theoretical saturation criteria, and ethical protocols to the unique features of online and digital research environments.Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Digital Straussian Grounded Theory · Constructivist Grounded Theory. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare