ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Difference-in-Means Estimator×Survey Experiment×
DomainePolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine19232011
Auteur d'origineJerzy Neyman (design-based potential-outcomes framework)Experimental political science; synthesized by Diana Mutz
TypeDesign-based estimator of the average treatment effectRandomized experiment embedded in a survey
Source fondatriceGerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2012). Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W. W. Norton. ISBN: 9780393979954Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691144528
AliasNeyman estimator, Design-based ATE estimator, Difference of sample means, Mean-difference treatment effect estimatorPopulation-based survey experiment, Survey-embedded experiment, Question-wording experiment, Framing experiment
Apparentées44
RésuméThe difference-in-means estimator is the design-based workhorse for analyzing randomized experiments: it estimates the average treatment effect simply as the difference between the average outcome among treated units and the average outcome among control units. Rooted in Jerzy Neyman's potential-outcomes framework and central to modern treatments by Imbens and Rubin and by Gerber and Green, it is unbiased under randomization, comes with a conservative Neyman variance estimator, and supports exact randomization inference, requiring no model of how outcomes are generated.A survey experiment embeds a randomized experiment inside a survey: respondents are randomly assigned to different versions of a question, frame, or stimulus, and their answers are compared to estimate a causal effect. By combining the internal validity of randomization with the representative samples and rich measurement of survey research, survey experiments — especially population-based ones — let political scientists draw causal inferences about how information, framing, or message attributes shape public attitudes and behavior.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Difference-in-Means Estimator · Survey Experiment. Consulté le 2026-06-24 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare