Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Méthode du journal× | Journal de recherche× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Méthodologie d'enquête | Méthodologie d'enquête |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1920s–1940s (systematised by Allport, 1942) | 1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Gordon Allport (systematic social-science use); Nels Anderson (early fieldwork diaries) | Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment) |
| Type≠ | Qualitative / mixed-methods data-collection technique | Qualitative data collection and reflexivity tool |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Alaszewski, A. (2006). Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761941415 | Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗ |
| Alias | diary study, diary technique, self-report diary, daily diary method | researcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary |
| Apparentées≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Résumé≠ | The diary method is a data-collection technique in which participants record their thoughts, behaviours, events, or experiences in their own words at regular or event-contingent intervals over a defined study period. By capturing data close in time to the event, diaries reduce retrospective recall bias and give researchers access to the texture of everyday life as it unfolds — something one-off surveys and retrospective interviews cannot provide. | A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|