ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Conception d'une étude de précision diagnostique×Évaluation des tests et programmes de dépistage×
DomaineRecherche cliniqueÉpidémiologie
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2003-20151968 (Wilson-Jungner principles); statistical framework developed 1970s–2000s
Auteur d'origineBossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneersWilson & Jungner (WHO criteria, 1968); foundational work by Pepe, Altman, and others in statistical test evaluation
TypeResearch DesignObservational diagnostic / epidemiological evaluation design
Source fondatriceBossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗Wilson, J. M. G., & Jungner, G. (1968). Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. Public Health Papers No. 34. link ↗
Aliasdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluationscreening study, screening performance evaluation, screening accuracy assessment, STE
Apparentées26
RésuméA diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.Screening test evaluation is a systematic epidemiological approach for assessing whether a test or program can accurately and cost-effectively identify individuals with a condition before symptoms appear. It quantifies diagnostic performance metrics — sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and the ROC curve — and evaluates whether a screening program meets established public health criteria for adoption and harm-benefit balance.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design · Screening Test Evaluation. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare