Comparer des méthodes

	Méthode Delphi	Évaluation du rapport additif	AROMAN
Domaine	Prise de décision	Prise de décision	Prise de décision
Famille	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Année d'origine	1963	2010	2022
Auteur d'origine	Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M.
Type	Weight_Subjective (expert consensus, iterative Likert/ranking)	Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)	Two-step normalisation (linear + vector) with weighted power aggregation
Source fondatrice	Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science	Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy	Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. (2022). AROMAN — Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering
Alias	—	—	—
Apparentées	8	8	8
Résumé	DELPHI (Delphi Method — iterative expert consensus for criterion importance elicitation) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Dalkey, N., Helmer, O. in 1963. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AROMAN (Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalisation) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zdravković, M., Hamid, M., Radovanović, M. in 2022. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.