Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| Simulation de la lumière du jour× | Systèmes de notation des bâtiments écologiques× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Architecture | Architecture |
| Famille | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Année d'origine≠ | 2006 | 1998 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Christoph Reinhart, John Mardaljevic | U.S. Green Building Council |
| Type≠ | computational daylighting assessment method | multi-criteria sustainability rating system |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Reinhart, C. F., Mardaljevic, J., Rogers, Z. (2010). Dynamic Daylight Performance Metrics for Sustainable Building Design. Leukos, 3(1), 7-31. DOI ↗ | U.S. Green Building Council (2021). LEED v4.1 for Building Design and Construction. USGBC. link ↗ |
| Alias | daylighting analysis, illuminance simulation, daylight availability assessment | LEED certification, green building assessment, sustainability rating |
| Apparentées | 3 | 3 |
| Résumé≠ | Daylight Simulation is a computational method for predicting the availability and distribution of daylight in interior spaces and assessing visual comfort under varying sky conditions. Developed by researchers like Christoph Reinhart and John Mardaljevic in the 2000s, it has become central to designing healthy, energy-efficient buildings that maximize natural light while controlling glare. | Green Building Rating Systems are standardized frameworks for assessing and certifying the environmental performance and sustainability of buildings. The most widely known is LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), established by the U.S. Green Building Council in 1998. Similar systems exist globally (BREEAM in UK, Passivhaus in Europe), each using structured criteria to evaluate design and performance across multiple environmental dimensions. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|