ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Cubic-EDAS×Méthode Meilleur-Pire×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine20232015
Auteur d'originePaul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M.Rezaei, J.
TypeCubic Pythagorean Fuzzy ranking — CuPyFN = ⟨IvPyFN, PyFN⟩ = (⟨[Y⁻,Y⁺],[F⁻,F⁺]⟩,⟨Y,F⟩); Pythagorean constraint (Y⁺)²+(F⁺)² ≤ 1; average-solution EDAS with score-function PDA/NDAPairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP
Source fondatricePaul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. (2023). Multi-criteria group decision-making method in disposal of municipal solid waste based on cubic Pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach with incomplete weight information. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméCUBIC-EDAS (Cubic-EDAS — Cubic Pythagorean Fuzzy EDAS (CuP-EDAS)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Paul, T.K., Jana, C., Pal, M. in 2023. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: CUBIC-EDAS · BWM. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare