ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Plan expérimental croisé avec groupe témoin×Conception expérimentale avec groupe témoin×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origineMid-20th century; systematic treatment from 1980s onward1935 (Fisher); 1963 (Campbell & Stanley codification)
Auteur d'origineEstablished in clinical pharmacology and agricultural research; formalized by B. Jones & M. G. KenwardRonald A. Fisher; systematised by Donald T. Campbell & Julian C. Stanley
TypeExperimental designExperimental research design
Source fondatriceJones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (2003). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials (2nd ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. ISBN: 978-1584883500Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Rand McNally. link ↗
Aliascrossover controlled trial, within-subject crossover with control, AB/BA crossover controlled design, repeated-measures crossover with control armcontrolled experiment, true experimental design, randomized controlled design, treatment-control design
Apparentées64
RésuméA crossover control group experimental design is an experimental approach in which participants are randomly assigned to sequences of conditions that include both a treatment and a control (no-treatment or placebo) period, with each participant experiencing both the experimental and control conditions in succession. By using each participant as their own control across periods, this design sharply reduces between-subject variability and typically requires fewer participants than parallel group trials to achieve equivalent statistical power.Control group experimental design is a fundamental experimental structure in which participants are assigned to at least two groups — a treatment group that receives the intervention and a control group that does not — so that the effect of the intervention can be isolated by comparing outcomes across groups. Randomisation of assignment strengthens causal inference by balancing known and unknown confounders.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Crossover Control Group Experimental Design · Control Group Experimental Design. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare