Comparer des méthodes
Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.
| CRITIC-M× | Analyse des rapports d'évaluation pondérée par étapes× | |
|---|---|---|
| Domaine | Prise de décision | Prise de décision |
| Famille | MCDM | MCDM |
| Année d'origine≠ | 1995 | 2010 |
| Auteur d'origine≠ | Based on Diakoulaki et al.'s CRITIC; modified variants developed later | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. |
| Type≠ | Objective weight derivation via correlation and variance | Sequential step-ratio subjective weighting |
| Source fondatrice≠ | Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770. DOI ↗ | Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management DOI ↗ |
| Alias≠ | CRITIC-M, Modified CRITIC | — |
| Apparentées≠ | 3 | 8 |
| Résumé≠ | CRITIC-M (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation - Modified) is an objective weight derivation method that extends the classical CRITIC approach. It assigns weights to criteria based on two intrinsic properties of the decision matrix: variance (how much a criterion differentiates alternatives) and correlation (how much a criterion conflicts with or supplements others). Modified variants adjust the formulation to improve robustness or interpretability. | SWARA (Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateJeu de données ↗ |
|
|