Comparer des méthodes

	Explications contrefactuelles	LIME : Explications Locales Interprétables Agnostiques du Modèle
Domaine	Apprentissage automatique	Apprentissage automatique
Famille	Machine learning	Machine learning
Année d'origine	2017	2016
Auteur d'origine	Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt & Chris Russell	Marco Ribeiro, Sameer Singh & Carlos Guestrin
Type	Post-hoc, model-agnostic explanation	post-hoc local explanation
Source fondatrice	Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31, 841–887.	Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). "Why should I trust you?": Explaining the predictions of any classifier. ACM SIGKDD, 1135–1144.
Alias	Algorithmic Recourse, Contrastive Explanations, What-If Explanations, Karşıolgusal Açıklamalar	Local Surrogate Explanations, Model-Agnostic Local Explanations, Locally Faithful Approximations, Yerel Yorumlanabilir Model-Bağımsız Açıklamalar
Apparentées	2	2
Résumé	Counterfactual explanations, introduced by Wachter, Mittelstadt, and Russell in 2017, answer the question: 'What is the smallest change to the input that would have produced a different model output?' Rather than explaining why a model made a decision, they describe what would need to change for that decision to be reversed, making them particularly valuable for high-stakes applications such as credit scoring, medical diagnosis, and hiring decisions under frameworks like the EU GDPR.	LIME, introduced by Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin in 2016, explains the predictions of any black-box classifier or regressor by building a simple, locally faithful surrogate model around a single prediction of interest. Rather than explaining the global model, LIME focuses on why a specific instance was classified the way it was, making complex models such as deep neural networks and ensemble methods interpretable to end-users, domain experts, and auditors.