Comparer des méthodes

	Corporatism Analysis	Welfare Regime Analysis
Domaine	Political Economy	Political Economy
Famille	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Année d'origine	1974	1990
Auteur d'origine	Philippe C. Schmitter	Gosta Esping-Andersen
Type	Conceptual-comparative framework	Comparative typological framework
Source fondatrice	Schmitter, P. C. (1974). Still the Century of Corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1), 85-131.	Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 9780691028576
Alias	Neo-Corporatism Analysis, Interest Intermediation Analysis, Concertation Analysis, Corporatism vs Pluralism Framework	Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Welfare State Regime Typology, Esping-Andersen Welfare Typology, Decommodification Analysis
Apparentées	3	3
Résumé	Corporatism analysis is the conceptual and comparative framework for characterizing how organized interests are represented and incorporated into policymaking, defined classically by Philippe Schmitter's 1974 essay 'Still the Century of Corporatism?'. Schmitter contrasts corporatism — a system in which a limited number of singular, compulsory, non-competitive, hierarchically ordered peak associations are recognized or licensed by the state and granted a representational monopoly in exchange for controlling their members — with pluralism, in which many voluntary, competing, non-hierarchical associations vie for influence. The framework further distinguishes societal from state corporatism and analyzes tripartite concertation among government, labor, and capital.	Welfare regime analysis classifies welfare states not by how much they spend but by the qualitative logic of how they distribute welfare, following Gosta Esping-Andersen's 1990 The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Its two organizing concepts are decommodification — the degree to which people can sustain a livelihood independent of the market — and stratification — the patterns of social inequality that welfare arrangements reproduce or alter. On these dimensions Esping-Andersen identified three clustered regime types: the liberal, the conservative-corporatist, and the social-democratic. His 1999 sequel extended the framework to the family and the postindustrial service economy, and a large critical literature has since debated additional types.