ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Évaluation Proportionnelle Complexe×Fuzzy AHP×
DomainePrise de décisionPrise de décision
FamilleMCDMMCDM
Année d'origine19961983
Auteur d'origineZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W.
TypeProportional assessment (benefit/cost split)Pairwise comparison with Triangular Fuzzy Number (TFN: l, m, u) judgments — umbrella over Van Laarhoven-Pedrycz 1983, Buckley 1985, Chang 1992 extent analysis, Cheng 1996 entropy-based
Source fondatriceZavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems DOI ↗
Alias
Apparentées88
RésuméCOPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.FUZZY-AHP (Fuzzy AHP — Fuzzy extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., Pedrycz, W. in 1983. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: COPRAS · FUZZY-AHP. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare