Comparer des méthodes

	Évaluation Proportionnelle Complexe	Processus d'analyse hiérarchique	ANP
Domaine	Prise de décision	Prise de décision	Prise de décision
Famille	MCDM	MCDM	MCDM
Année d'origine	1996	1980	1996
Auteur d'origine	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A.	Saaty, T. L.	Saaty, T. L.
Type	Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split)	Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue)	Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure)
Source fondatrice	Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65	Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713	Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8
Alias	—	—	—
Apparentées	8	8	8
Résumé	COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.	ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.