ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Conjoint Survey Experiment×Factorial Survey Experiment×
DomainePolitical SciencePolitical Science
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine20141982
Auteur d'origineJens Hainmueller, Daniel Hopkins, Teppei YamamotoPeter H. Rossi and collaborators
TypeMulti-attribute forced-choice survey experiment with design-based causal estimandsMulti-factor randomized vignette experiment
Source fondatriceHainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI ↗Wallander, L. (2009). 25 Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review. Social Science Research, 38(3), 505–520. DOI ↗
AliasCausal conjoint, Forced-choice conjoint experiment, AMCE conjoint, Conjoint experimentFactorial survey, Factorial survey approach, Multi-factor vignette survey, Rossi vignette method
Apparentées43
RésuméA conjoint survey experiment presents respondents with profiles — of candidates, immigrants, policies, or products — described by several attributes whose levels are independently randomized, and asks respondents to choose between or rate the profiles. Hainmueller, Hopkins, and Yamamoto's 2014 framework places this design on a rigorous causal footing, defining the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as the design-based causal effect of an attribute level, averaged over the randomization distribution of all other attributes. It lets political scientists estimate the relative causal weight of many decision factors simultaneously from realistic, multidimensional choices.A factorial survey experiment, often simply called a factorial survey, asks respondents to judge short descriptions — vignettes — whose multiple features are fully crossed and randomly varied. By factorially combining many dimensions, each at several levels, the design generates a large universe of vignettes; respondents rate a random sample of them, and regression of the ratings on the dimension levels recovers the independent causal effect of each feature on judgment. It scales the single-scenario vignette experiment up to many simultaneously manipulated attributes.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Conjoint Survey Experiment · Factorial Survey Experiment. Consulté le 2026-06-25 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare