ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Analyse conjointe×Plan factoriel fractionnaire 2^(k-p)×
DomainePlans d'expériencesPlans d'expériences
FamilleHypothesis testHypothesis test
Année d'origine19781961
Auteur d'originePaul E. Green & V. SrinivasanGeorge E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter
TypeDecomposition-based utility estimationScreening and economical factorial design
Source fondatriceGreen, P.E. & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. DOI ↗Box, G.E.P. & Hunter, J.S. (1961). The 2^(k-p) Fractional Factorial Designs. Technometrics, 3(3), 311–351. link ↗
AliasCBC conjoint, choice-based conjoint, adaptive conjoint analysis, full-profile conjoint2^k-p design, fractional factorial, screening design, Kesirli Faktöriyel Desen (2^k-p Fractional Factorial)
Apparentées67
RésuméConjoint analysis is a preference-measurement technique that decomposes overall product evaluations into the separate utility values — called part-worths — that respondents assign to each attribute level. Formalised by Green and Srinivasan in their seminal 1978 Journal of Consumer Research paper, the method has become the dominant tool in marketing research and product design for quantifying what buyers truly trade off when they choose between options.The fractional factorial design is an economical experimental strategy that investigates k factors by running only a carefully chosen 1/2^p fraction of the full 2^k factorial experiment. Formalized by George E. P. Box and J. Stuart Hunter in their landmark 1961 Technometrics paper, it exploits the sparsity-of-effects principle — that high-order interactions are typically negligible — to screen many factors with far fewer runs than a complete factorial would require.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Conjoint Analysis · Fractional Factorial Design. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare