ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Méthodes mixtes pragmatiques concurrentes×Conception pragmatique de la méthodologie mixte×
DomaineConception de la rechercheConception de la recherche
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine2000s–2010sEarly 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
Auteur d'origineJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark; philosophical grounding by R. Burke Johnson & Anthony OnwuegbuzieJohn W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
TypeMixed methods research designMixed methods research design
Source fondatriceCreswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
Aliasconcurrent pragmatic design, pragmatic concurrent mixed methods, simultaneous pragmatic mixed methodspragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
Apparentées66
RésuméConcurrent pragmatic mixed methods is a research design that collects quantitative and qualitative data simultaneously within a pragmatic philosophical framework. Rather than privileging either positivism or constructivism, the pragmatic stance selects methods based on what best answers the research question. Both data strands are gathered in parallel, then merged at the interpretation stage to provide a fuller picture than either strand alone could yield.Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Concurrent Pragmatic Mixed Methods · Pragmatic Mixed Methods Design. Consulté le 2026-06-18 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare