ScholarGate
Assistant

Comparer des méthodes

Examinez les méthodes sélectionnées côte à côte ; les lignes qui diffèrent sont mises en évidence.

Recherche comparative sur les histoires de vie×Histoire orale×
DomaineQualitatifQualitatif
FamilleProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Année d'origine1920s (life history origins); comparative variant prominent from 1980s–1990s1948 (modern disciplinary form); broader roots in 19th-century folklore and anthropology
Auteur d'origineIvor Goodson; influenced by C. Wright Mills and W. I. Thomas & Florian ZnanieckiAllan Nevins (Columbia University Oral History Project, 1948); earlier roots in folk-life and anthropological fieldwork
TypeQualitative comparative research designQualitative research method
Source fondatriceGoodson, I. F. (Ed.). (1992). Studying Teachers' Lives. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415064248Ritchie, D. A. (2003). Doing Oral History: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195176957
Aliascomparative life history, cross-case life history, comparative biographical method, comparative biographical life historylife history interview, oral testimony, spoken history, oral narrative research
Apparentées66
RésuméComparative life history research is a qualitative approach that collects extended first-person accounts of individuals' lives across two or more cases, groups, or social contexts, then systematically compares these accounts to identify shared patterns, divergences, and the social forces that shape biographical trajectories. It bridges the depth of life history with the analytical leverage of cross-case comparison, making it especially powerful for understanding how social structure, culture, or institutional context shapes individual experience over time.Oral history is a qualitative research method that collects, preserves, and interprets first-person spoken accounts of past events, experiences, and social processes. By recording in-depth interviews with individuals who witnessed or participated in historical events, oral historians document perspectives that written records often exclude. The method bridges historical scholarship and social science, treating the narrator's memory, subjectivity, and voice as primary evidence rather than as limitations to be corrected.
ScholarGateJeu de données
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Sources
  3. PUBLISHED

Aller à la recherche Télécharger les diapositives

ScholarGateComparer des méthodes: Comparative Life history research · Oral History. Consulté le 2026-06-20 sur https://scholargate.app/fr/compare